Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Hdfc Bank Limited Vs Geekay International and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2017)

Home
Bombay HC
2017
Hdfc Bank Limited Vs Geekay International and Ors.Hdfc Bank Limited v. Geekay International and Ors.

Dismissed

Hdfc Bank Limited v. Geekay International and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Jan 2017CP/374/2016

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

57cp374-16.doc

1

Pvr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Contempt Petition NO. 374 OF 2016

Hdfc Bank Limited ...Petitioner Versus Geekay International And Ors ...Respondents

Mr.Chetan Kapadia with Mr.Salil Saiyed & Ms.Naina Jain i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co., for the Petitioner.

None for the Respondents.

...... CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE : 9^th January,2017 ---

ORDER :-

Mr.Kapadia, learned Counsel for the Petitioner fairly submits that proceedings are already initiated by the Petitioner for appropriate reliefs in the Original Application pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, against the persons, who according to the Petitioner, are beneficiaries of the transaction undertaken in breach of the order of interim injunction dated 23 January 2009 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal. In this situation, learned Counsel for the Petitioner appropriately seeks leave to withdraw this contempt petition, with liberty to pursue the pending proceedings initiated before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. Accordingly, allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn. All contentions of the parties on merits of the matter are expressly kept open.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Hdfc Bank Limited
respondent
Geekay International And Ors

Coram

AI extract

G. S. KULKARNI

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 9 Jan 2017 · January
Registered: 20 Sept 2016
Case no.: CP/374/2016
CNR: HCBM010352272016
Topic: Contempt of Court
Bench: G. S. Kulkarni
Disposal: Allowed To be withdrawn

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from G. S. Kulkarni

Ashok Hadumal Chandwani Vs Shri Abhijit Prakashrao Patil and Ors.
6 Jan 2017
Budharam Ganpat Sarnobat Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
6 Jan 2017Public Interest Litigation
Shri. Devang Jayantbhai Jani Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
6 Jan 2017Public Interest Litigation
Mr. Anoop Kumar, Chief Promoter, Gera Sky Villas Chsl Vs Cpi Gera Realty India Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
9 Jan 2017
Vicky Apartment Chs Limited Vs Mr Harshad S Rana and Anr.
9 Jan 2017
Sudam Bhikoba Jadhav and Anr. Vs the Karad Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and Ors.
12 Jan 2017

Cite this judgement

Hdfc Bank Limited v. Geekay International and Ors., CP/374/2016 (BOM), decided on 9 January 2017.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

G. S. KULKARNI

Parties & counsel