Balaso Malhappa Khatkole v. Shri Ajit Pawar, Additional Collector and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The contempt petition was dropped as the petitioner reported compliance with the Court's direction. No substantive legal issues were examined.
The contempt petition was dropped as the petitioner reported compliance with the Court's direction. No substantive legal issues were examined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CP 252-15.doc-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.252 OF 2015
Balaso Malhappa Khatkole. ] … Petitioner Versus Shri Ajit Pawar, Additional Collector, ] Kolhapur & Ors. ] … Respondents
Mr. Rahul P. Walvekar for Petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for State.
CORAM :- DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J., & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- 9 MARCH, 2017
P. C. :-
Since the direction of the Court now being complied with, as reported by the learned Counsel for petitioner, the contempt proceedings are dropped.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1 of 1
URS
Balaso Malhappa Khatkole
Shri Ajit Pawar
Dr. Manjula Chellur
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court