The High Court of Bombay dismissed the company appeal as it had been withdrawn by the appellant after accepting undertakings regarding a report on confidentiality provided by respondent no. 9.
Leave to withdraw the Appeal was granted; consequently, the Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2.coapp.10.2017.cp.27.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2017
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 27 OF 2013
Adil Faramroz Patrawala .. Appellant Vs. Reliance Capital Ltd. & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Sarosh Bharucha a/w. Ms. Prachi Pandya i/b Corporate Attorneys for appellant.
Mr.Mayur Shetty a/w. Mr. Dikshant Mhera i/b M/s. Rajani Associates for respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5, 7 and 8.
Mr.Devanshu P. Desai for respondent no.2.
Mr.Piyush Raheja i/b V. Deshpande & Co. for respondent no.9.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 14TH NOVEMBER 2017
P.C.
this week, respondent no.9 will provide legible and readable photocopy of the report of M/s. N.D. Kapur which is referred in this Appeal certified as 'true copy' by the advocate on record for respondent no.9. Statement of
Mr.Raheja that this will be supplied before the end of this week is accepted.
terms of order dated 17th September 2014 on confidentiality of this report
1/2
Shraddha Talekar PS
2
2.coapp.10.2017.cp.27.2013.doc
will be considered as undertakings in this order as well.
Liberty to apply.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
2/2
Shraddha Talekar PS
Adil Faramroz Patrawala
Reliance Capital Ltd. & Ors.
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
