The Court appointed Mr. Raj Mohan Patel as the sole Arbitrator to decide disputes regarding the refund of security deposits between Petitioner and Respondent, pursuant to consent under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Appointment of Mr. Raj Mohan Patel as sole Arbitrator; proceedings to be heard by the Arbitrator; cases disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
21 carbp 438-17 with carap 104-17-o
priya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION AND IN IT'S COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.438 of 2017 AND COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.104 of 2017
| Toyota Lakozy Auto Pvt. Ltd. V/s. |
... | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Shakuntala Jamb | ... | Respondent |
Mr. B.K.Ashok i/by M/s Bekay Legal for the Petitioner. Mr. Kunal Dwarkadas with Mr. Oaril Panchal i/by M/s Mahimtura and Company for the Respondent.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 14, 2017.
P.C. :
ORDER
priya
2 21 carbp 438-17 with carap 104-17-o
out of, in connection with and relating to the refund of security deposits claimed by Petitioner in the Lease Deed dated 22nd April, 2010 and Amenities Agreement dated 22nd April, 2010.
priya 3 21 carbp 438-17 with carap 104-17-o
(K.R.SHRIRAM, J.)
…..
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Mr. Raj Mohan Patel be appointed as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from the Lease Deed and Amenities Agreement.
Whether the Arbitrator was authorized to hear the Petition as an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Toyota Lakozy Auto Pvt. Ltd.
Shakuntala Jamb
K.R.SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
