The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, dismissed a civil application seeking modification in the cause title description, noting the need for a formal application and rejecting oral leave.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 caw718.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.W. NO.718/2017
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1425/2017 Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode
..Vs..
Presiding officer / Tahsildar, Dhamangaon Rly.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri S.G. Shukla, Adv. for the petitioner. Shri B.M. Lonare, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1.
CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.
DATE : 2.5.2017.
Heard.
By this application the petitioner seeks modification in the description of respondent No.1 in the cause title. It is stated that the words “Presiding Officer” were deleted as per leave granted by the Court orally. The prayer made in this application cannot be granted as the petitioner will have to file proper application and pray for amendment in the cause title. Furthermore, the statement made on behalf of the petitioner that he was granted leave orally cannot be accepted. Civil application is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file proper application. No costs.
JUDGE
Tambaskar .
Manoj Ghanshyamdas Banode
Presiding officer / Tahsildar, Dhamangaon Rly.
Z.A.HAQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
