This court allowed the Civil Application seeking amendment to the Writ Petition directed to the Union of India. It fixed a week for the amendment and four weeks for the respondents' reply.
Civil Application allowed; amendment to be carried out within a week; respondents to file reply within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sr.925.cw.2895.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2895 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 11798 OF 2017
Paxchem Limited & anr. …Applicants In the matter between Paxchem Limited & anr. Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & ors.
…Respondents
Mr.Kevic Setalvad, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Anupam Surve, Mr. Nikhil Mutha, Mr.Pritika Lobo i/b. M/s.Nanu Hormasjee & Co. for the applicants. Mr.J. S. Saluja for respondent no.1.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & R. G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 18 th DECEMBER, 2017.
P.C. :
Vina k 1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the amendment in the writ petition should be allowed.
Whether the timeline for carrying out the amendment and filing reply should be fixed.
Paxchem Limited
Union of India
Shantanu S. Kemkar
R. G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
