Allowed
Sau. Jyotsana Ravindra Jadhao and Others v. the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others
Bombay HCCAW/2699/2016
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 caw2699.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2699 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.6929 OF 2016
(Sau. Jyotsana Ravindra Jadhao and others ..vs.. The Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J. DATED : 21-04-2017
For the reasons stated in the application, the petitioners are permitted to amend the petition as prayed.
The civil application is allowed accordingly.
JUDGE
adgokar
Jyotsana Ravindra Jadhao and others
The Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and others
Z.A. Haq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court