Vishnu S/O Narayanrao Rathod Vs Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Mumbai through Member Secretary and Others

¶1

1608caw1807.17.odt

¶2

1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION W. NO.1807/2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5992/2016

¶5

Vishnu s/o Narayanrao Rathod ...Versus...

¶6

Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Mumbai – 400 021 through its Member Secretary and others

¶7

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶9

Court's or Judge's orders

¶10

¶11

Shri P.D. Meghe, Advocate for petitioner Shri D.M. Kakani, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 Shri A.M. Balpande, AGP for respondent no.3

¶12

Petitioner seeks leave to incorporate challenge to punishment of withholding pension and recovery of certain amount.

¶13

According to Advocate Shri Kakani, main prayer in petition as filed is only to release pension after superannuation with other retiral benefits. He, therefore, submits that nature of challenge undergoes drastic change and therefore, a fresh petition should be filed.

¶14

Advocate Shri Meghe points out that petitioner was already superannuated when he approached this Court and he was also exonerated by Enquiry Officer. On the strength of that exoneration, petition came to be filed.

¶15

1608caw1807.17.odt

¶16

2

¶17

In normal circumstance, we would have accepted technical objection raised by Advocate Shri Kakani, however, here person, who has already superannuated and was seeking pension and other retirement benefits, has been denied the same because of order of punishment passed during pendency of writ petition.

¶18

We, therefore, allow the civil application. Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks.

¶19

Liberty to respondents to file their additional reply/reply, if any, within next four weeks.

¶20

List the matter on 07/11/2017.

¶21

JUDGE JUDGE

¶22

Wadkar

Vishnu S/O Narayanrao Rathod v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Mumbai through Member Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu S/O Narayanrao Rathod v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Mumbai through Member Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Abhijeet Infrastructure Ltd., Nagpur Vs the Banking Ombudsman (Maharashtra and Goa), Mumbai and Another

Shirang a. Pathak and Others Vs Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati Thr. Registrar and Others

Darbarsingh S/O Narayansingh Rajput Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Social Justice and Empowerment Deptt., Mumbai and Others

Shri Mohan Marotrao Karemore Vs Chairman, Nagpur Improvement Trust, Nagpur

Purushottam S/O Vitthalrao Pagrut Vs Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, Mumbai through Member Secretary and Others

Dr. (Mrs.) Sadhana W/O. Bhupesh Makde and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Dept. of Higher and Technical Education and Others