The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench rejected a civil application seeking a stay on a disciplinary inquiry regarding the applicant. The court held that due to the pendency of older matters, the prayer could not be granted immediately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-CAW-165-1 7
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.165 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.6096 OF 2016
Avinash s/o Mulsingh Rathod, Washim
-vs-
The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept. Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Shri Anand Sadavarte, Advocate for applicant/petitioner. Shri N. S. Rao, AGP for respondents.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI &
A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATE : April 12, 2017
Considering pendency of older matters, prayer
made in the present application cannot be granted.
Civil application is rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
Asmita
Avinash s/o Mulsingh Rathod
The State of Maharashtra
B. R. Gavai
A. S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
