Final hearing notice for C.A.W. 874/17. Counsel for petitioner stated no orders were necessary, and the application was disposed of without any substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.4CAW.874.17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
C.A.W. NO. 874/17 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1218 OF 2008. (Rajesh Surendra Binkar .vs. The Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.S. Ghate, Advocate for petitioner,
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ. DATED : APRIL 11, 2017.
The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that since the petition is already on Board for final hearing, no orders are necessary. The application is disposed of as such.
Judge
Judge
J.
Rajesh Surendra Binkar
The Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Labour
B.R. Gavai
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
