Special leave/special court order dismissing the writ petition for want of prosecution after non-appearance of the petitioner and respondents despite interim directions for reinstatement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp3526.08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3526/2008
Mirza Akhatar Baig Mirza Musawvir Baig ..Vs..
Public Education Society, Murtizapur and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.
DATE : 4.5.2017.
None appeared for the petitioner as well as respondent Nos.1 and 2 on 13th April, 2017 and 25th April, 2017. Today again none appeared for the petitioner and the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Heard Ms. S.Z. Haider, A.G.P. for the respondent No.3.
With the assistance of the learned A.G.P. I have examined the documents placed on the record of the petition.
The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the School Tribunal by which the appeal filed by him is dismissed and the order of removal of the petitioner from service by the Management is upheld.
By an interim order passed by this Court on 19th November, 2008 the Management was directed to reinstate the petitioner and to pay salary. The respondent No.1 - Management has filed Civil Application No.1088/2017 on 3rd May, 2017 in which it
2 wp3526.08
is stated that inspite of the interim order, the petitioner has not reported for joining the service and he is working in some other institution.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.
CAW NO.1088/2017 .
In view of dismissal of the petition, the application filed by the respondent No.1 for dismissal of the writ petition has become infructuous, hence, it is disposed of.
Tambaskar .
3 wp3526.08
Mirza Akhatar Baig Mirza Musawvir Baig
Public Education Society, Murtizapur
Z.A.Haq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
