Smt. Nutan Shashikant Kini and Ors. v. Shri. Ramdas Arjun Madhavi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What did the court decide?
Civil Application stands allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAF48_17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.48 OF 2017
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.642 OF 2016
(Nutan Shashikant Kini and others Vs. Bhagwan Arjun Madhavi and others)
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances,Court's orders, or directions, and Registrar's Orders
Mr. Akash D. Warang for Applicants. Mr. S. M. Kamble for Respondent No.2.
Mr. Gautam Jain i/b. Mr. Bhatt for Respondents No.1, 6, 7 and 10 in F.A.No.642 of 2016.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & R. G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 10TH NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C.:
Heard.
(R. G. KETKAR, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Minal Parab
1/1
Nutan Shashikant Kini and others
Bhagwan Arjun Madhavi and others
Naresh H. Patil
R. G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court