Allowed
Mr. Anant Arjun Madhavi v. Mr. Ramdas Arjun Madhavi and Ors.
Bombay HCCAF/45/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAF43to45_17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.43 OF 2017
AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.45 OF 2017 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.642 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances,Court's orders, or directions, and Registrar's Orders
Mr. Prabhakar M. Jadhav for Applicants. Mr. S. M. Kamble for Respondent No.2. Mr. Gautam Jain i/b. Mr. Bhatt for Respondents No.1, 6, 7 and 10 in F.A.No.642 of 2016.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & R. G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 10TH NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C.:
The Counsel submits that it will be in the interest of justice to bring legal representatives of the parties, who are dead, on record. The Counsel further submits that the respondents are served and to that effect, affidavit of service is filed.
1/2
CAF43to45_17.doc
Minal Parab
amendment within two weeks. Civil Applications are disposed of.
(R. G. KETKAR, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil applications seeking to bring legal representatives on record are allowabl
Applicants
Respondent No.2
Respondents No.1, 6, 7 and 10
NARESH H. PATIL
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court