This is an application for expediting the hearing of a pending Civil Revision Application. The court found no sufficient case for expedition and dismissed the application, directing the CRA to be listed in its usual turn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7.cac.191.2017.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 191 OF 2017 IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 526 OF 2016
Ravikant Shankarappa Patil ...Applicant In the matter between Tukaram Kallappa Vadaje & Anr. ...Petitioners vs Ravikant Shankarappa Patil & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr Surel S. Shah for the Applicant Mr A.K.Shinde for Respondent No.1. Mr A.S.Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.4A, 4B.
CORAM : B.P.COLABAWALLA, J. JUNE 13, 2017.
P.C. :
This Civil Application is moved for expediting the hearing of CRA. I find no case is made out for the same. The Civil Application is, therefore, dismissed.
2 The Civil Revision Application to be listed as per its usual turn.
( B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.)
Pg 1 of 1
Ravikant Shankarappa Patil
Tukaram Kallappa Vadaje
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
