Allowed condonation of delay and recall of dismissal order in a Civil Revision Application, directing admission of the matter.
Condoned delay of one year and 210 days and recalled the order dated 1st September, 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.cac.188.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 188 OF 2017 IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.1226 OF 2014
Shri Maruti Amritrao Mahangale ..Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Shri Maruti Amritrao Mahangale ..Applicant (Orig. Applicant)
Vs.
Shri Sunil Ram Jogade and Others ..Respondents
Mr. Rajdeep Gude i/b Mr. Shantanu Chandratre,for the Applicant. Mr. Rahul Singh,for the Respondents.
CORAM :- B. P. COLABAWALLA, J. DATE :- JUNE 12, 2017.
P. C.:
This Civil Application has been taken out for condoning
the delay of one year and 210 days as well as for recalling the order dated 1st September, 2015 which recorded that two weeks time is granted to supply copies of the Petition, failing which the Civil Revision Application shall stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Aswale 1/2
11.cac.188.17
2 For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). As far as prayer clause (c) is concerned, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant states that all the Respondents have been served with the copy of the Civil Revision Application. The learned counsel for the Respondents does not dispute this fact.
3 List the Civil Revision Application “for admission” on 20th June, 2017.
Aswale 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the Civil Revision Application can be condoned and the dismissal order recalled.
Shri Maruti Amritrao Mahangale
Shri Sunil Ram Jogade
B. P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
