The Court disposed of Company Application No. 592 of 2017 by dismissing it as withdrawn. The Company Prosecutor noted the company was winding up in another petition and had no objection to the application being disposed of in these terms.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
7.cp.188.2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 592 OF 2017 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 188 OF 2012
M/s. Serum Institute of India Ltd.
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Hiran Orgochem Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr.Kunal Naik i/b Madhav Jamdar for applicant.
Ms. Shaista Pathan i/b Yusufs and Associates for respondent.
Mr.Mahindhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor for Official Liquidator present.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 6TH NOVEMBER 2017
P.C.
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 592 OF 2017
Director of respondent and they did not wish to prosecute this application.
being wound up in another petition being Company Petition No. 631 of 2014 and therefore the official liquidator has no objection if this application is disposed as withdrawn.
1/2
Shraddha Talekar PS
2
7.cp.188.2012.doc
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
2/2
Shraddha Talekar PS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Serum Institute of India Ltd.
Hiran Orgochem Ltd.
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
