The Bombay High Court, in Company Application No. 513 of 2017 arising from Company Petition No. 1125 of 2001, allowed the applicant's application based on an affidavit, with the company prosecutor leaving the matter to the Court.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
42.ca.513.cp.1125.2001.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 513 OF 2017 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 1125 OF 2001
Dattaram Pednekar .. Applicant In the matter between : B.I.F.R. .. Petitioner Vs. The Official Liquidator of M/s. HES Limited (in liquidation) .. Respondent
Ms. Molina Pritam Thakur for applicant.
Mr.Mahendhar Aithe-company prosecutor for official liquidator present.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 6TH NOVEMBER 2017
P.C.
Heard the counsel for applicant and also considered the affidavit in
support. Mr.Aithe, company prosecutor leaves it to the Court.
Having heard Ms.Thakur and for the reasons mentioned in the
affidavit in support, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1/1
Shraddha Talekar PS
Dattaram Pednekar
B.I.F.R.
The Official Liquidator of M/s. HES Limited (in liquidation)
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
