This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
929 delay.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
929 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5114/2017
IN FAST/6822/2017
THE EX. ENGINEER, MAJALGAON CANAL DIV. NO 10, PARBHANI
UNDER G.M.I.D.C., AURANGAB
VERSUS
GANGADHAR HARIBHAU KATARE
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B.R. Surwase.
Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mahesh P. Kale.
ORDER:
1. This is an application for condonation of 104
days delay caused for filing an appeal.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent
has no objection to condone the delay.
3. In view of the above, Civil Application is
allowed. Delay caused for filing appeal is condoned.
4. Civil Application is disposed of.
5. This appeal be listed along with First Appeal
No. 1043/2017 which is filed by the claimants for
enhancement.
mkd
1/1
THE EX. ENGINEER, MAJALGAON CANAL DIV. NO 10, PARBHANI
GANGADHAR HARIBHAU KATARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court