Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, dismissed the applications for condonation of delay and disposed of the civil applications. Notices were issued for the First Appeals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca7192.17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7192 OF 2017 IN
FAST/11806/2017
WITH CA/7194/2017 IN FAST/11891/2017
WITH CA/7196/2017 IN FAST/11879/2017
WITH CA/7198/2017 IN FAST/11882/2017
WITH CA/7200/2017 IN FAST/11885/2017
WITH CA/7202/2017 IN FAST/11888/2017
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS
SUNANDA NAGNATH PAWAR
...
AGP for Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. A.M.Phule
Advocate for Respondents :
Patil Laxmikant C. R/sole.
.....
CORAM: K.L.WADANE, J.
DATED: 10th October, 2017
O R D E R :
These are the applications for condonation
of delay of 867 days caused in filing First
Appeals.
2. Heard learned counsel for both sides.
3.The other side has no objection for
condoning the delay.
4.For the reasons stated in the application
in para nos. 2 to 6, delay caused in filing First
Appeal is condoned.
2ca7192.17
5. Civil Applications are disposed of.
6. In First Appeals, issue notice to the
respondent, returnable on on 21.11.2017.
7. Mr. Patil, learned counsel waives service of notice for respondent.
(K.L.WADANE, J.)
dbm
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay for filing First Appeals is warranted?
Whether impugned order can be quashed on merit?
The State of Maharashtra and Ors
Sunanda Nagnath Pawar
K. L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court