This order allows the State of Maharashtra's civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a first appeal. The High Court accepted administrative difficulties as a cause for delay.
Civil Application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.A. No.4224/2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4224/2013 FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.2889/2013
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
VERSUS
Suklal Rajaram Patil
Shri S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for applicants Shri A.B. Kale, Advocate for respondent
CORAM: V.K. JADHAV, J.
DATED: 19th April, 2017.
ORAL ORDER :
C.A. No.4224/2013
2
no details have been given in the application about the so called administrative difficulties. The learned counsel submits that, this Court, in First Appeal No.2745/2015 and other connected matters, already disposed of the appeals preferred by the original claimants seeking enhancement in the compensation as awarded by the Reference Court and this Court, by order dated 21/10/2015, in those appeals, awarded the compensation at the enhanced rate @ Rs.600/- per sq.mtr. for open piece of land and for house property. The learned counsel submits that, in view of the same, no purpose would be served if the delay is condoned.
( V.K. JADHAV ) JUDGE
fmp/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal was sufficient to be condoned on grounds of administrative difficulties?
Whether the inordinate delay should be excused given the existing enhancements in compensation rates in related matters?
State of Maharashtra & ors.
Suklal Rajaram Patil
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
