Disposed

Lilabai Jagannath Baheti v. the Executive Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division, Latur Under Gmidc Aurangabad and Others

Bombay HC19 Dec 2017CA/13437/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of three civil applications seeking withdrawal of compensation deposited in the Reference Court. The court permitted applicants to withdraw the amounts along with interest upon furnishing an undertaking to re-deposit the funds within 12 weeks if their appeals were allowed. The court also noted a discrepancy regarding the deposit court.

What did the court decide?

Applicants permitted to withdraw compensation and interest from Reference Court by undertaking to re-deposit within 12 weeks if appeals are allowed.

Lilabai Jagannath Baheti Vs the Executive Engineer, Latur… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

916.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13436 OF 2017

¶4

IN FA/2178/2015

¶5

NAGESH KANHYALAL BHUTADA

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LATUR MINOR IRRIGATION
DIVISION, LATUR UNDER GMIDC AURANGABAD AND ANR

¶8

WITH

¶9

917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13437 OF 2017

¶10

IN FA/2187/2015

¶11

LILABAI JAGANNATH BAHETI

¶12

VERSUS

¶13

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LATUR MINOR IRRIGATION
DIVISION, LATUR UNDER GMIDC AURANGABAD AND ANR

¶14

WITH

¶15

918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13442 OF 2017

¶16

IN FA/2172/2015

¶17

RADHYESHAM JAGANNATH BAHETI

¶18

VERSUS

¶19

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LATUR MINOR IRRIGATION
DIVISION, LATUR UNDER GMIDC AURANGABAD AND ANR

¶20

...

¶21

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Kale Ajeet B.
AGP for Respondent No.2: Mr. B. A. Shinde
Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. B. R. Surwase

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

1. Heard Mr. Kale, the learned counsel for the

¶24

applicants, who submits that in another group of land

¶25

acquisition references, the Acquiring Body has
deposited the amount of compensation in Reference Court

¶26

and almost all claimants were allowed to withdraw the
amount of compensation, that too 100% without any
condition. The learned counsel appearing for the

¶27

1/2

¶28

916.odt Acquiring Body submits that the officer of the Acquiring Body has deposited the amount in the Reference Court inspite of the directions of this Court to deposit such amount in this Court.

¶29

2. Anyhow, the amount of compensation is deposited
with the Reference Court. The applicant can be
permitted to withdraw the same on certain conditions.

¶30

3. The applicants are permitted to withdraw the
amount of compensation deposited before the Reference
Court alongwith with interest accrued thereon on
furnishing undertaking that in the event the appeals
are allowed, then they shall re-deposit the said
amount within a period of 12 weeks from the date of
order.

¶31

4. Civil applications are accordingly disposed of.

¶32

(K. L. WADANE, J.)

¶33

JPC

¶34

2/2

Lilabai Jagannath Baheti v. the Executive Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division, Latur Under Gmidc Aurangabad and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lilabai Jagannath Baheti v. the Executive Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division, Latur Under Gmidc Aurangabad and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Savita Bhagwan Dudhe and Ors. Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Divisional Manager, Aurangabad an Anr.

Ganga Dharma @ Dharmraj Karadkar and Ors. Vs Ramesh Ashruba Hadule and Ors.

Dilip Ankushrao Ghare (Died) Thr Lrs Arvind and Anr. Vs the Ex. Engineer, M.I.W (Lmi) Division, Jalna and Ors.

Reshma Sadek Ansari and Ors. Vs Ranjana Sanjiv Karad and Ors.

Shripad Digambarrao Kulkarni and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Radhyesham Jagannath Baheti Vs the Executive Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division, Latur Under Gmidc Aurangabad and Others