The High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard applications for condonation of delay in filing first appeals. With no objection from the respondent, the court allowed the applications and disposed of the matters.
Delay for filing first appeals is condoned and applications are allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
924 delay.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8600 OF 2017
IN FAST/11727/2017 WITH CA/8597/2017 IN FAST/11735/2017
WITH CA/8572/2017 IN FAST/11741/2017 WITH CA/8574/2017
IN FAST/11731/2017 WITH CA/8633/2017 IN FAST/11738/2017
WITH CA/11278/2017 IN FAST/11723/2017
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
VERSUS
SAHEBRAO SHAMRAO SHELKE AND ORS
...
A.G.P. for Applicants : Mr. A.M.Phule.
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Kayyum N. Shaikh.
ORDER:
1. These are the applications for condonation of
delay caused for filing First Appeals.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
applicants as well as learned counsel appearing for the
respondents. Learned counsel for respondents has no
objection to condone the delay.
3. For the reasons recorded in the applications,
1/2
924 delay.odt applications are allowed. Delay caused for filing First Appeals is condoned.
4. Civil Applications are disposed of.
(K.L.WADANE,J.)
mkd
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing first appeals should be condoned.
The State of Maharashtra
Sahebrao Shamrao Shelke
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court