Aakash Ananta Maral v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application withdrawn. Court disposed of the application noting it was not heard on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA 924-17.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.924 OF 2017
Akash Ananta Maral .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr.A.Satpute, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.S.S.Kaushik, APP, for the Respondent – State
P.C.
. Mentioned out of turn at 2.00 p.m.
withdrawn. It is made clear, that this Application has not been heard on merits.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Akash Ananta Maral
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court