Allowed

Subhash Motiram Waghmare v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC9 Jun 2017APPP/106/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the criminal application seeking relaxation of bail conditions in Case B.A. No.2158/2013, dispensing with the requirement to attend the investigating agency on every Sunday as the trial had commenced and the first witness was present.

What did the court decide?

Relaxation of bail condition requiring attendance at the investigating agency on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 12.00 noon.

Subhash Motiram Waghmare Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

APPP 106-17.doc

¶2

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.106 OF 2017 IN

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO.2158 OF 2013

¶5

Subhash Motiram Waghmare .Applicant

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent

¶8

Mr.Rakesh Bhatkar i/b. Mr.Mohan Devkule, Advocate, for the Applicant Ms Anamika Malhotra, APP, for the Respondent – State

¶9

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 09.06.2017

(IN CHAMBER)

P.C.

. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶14

By this Application, the Applicant seeks relaxation of

¶15

the condition imposed by this Court (CORAM : A.R.JOSHI, J.)

¶16

vide Order dated 06.02.2014 in B.A.No.2158 of 2013.

¶17

The condition of which relaxation is sought reads

¶18

thus :-

¶19

(iii) On availing the bail, as above, the applicant shall attend the office of the investigating agency on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon, till the conclusion of the trial.

¶20

1 of 3

¶21

APPP 106-17.doc

¶22

Learned counsel for the Applicant states that pursuant to the Order dated 06.02.2014, the Applicant has been attending the concerned police station on every Sunday between

¶23

10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon. He submits that the trial has commenced and the first witness is in the witness box. He states that the Applicant has been attending the trial Court on the dates given by the trial Court.

¶24

Learned APP does not dispute the said statement.

¶25

Perused the papers.

¶26

The condition was imposed in February, 2014. It is not in dispute that the Applicant has complied with the condition till date. It is also not in dispute that the trial has commenced and the first witness is in the witness box. The statement of the learned counsel for the Applicant is accepted, that the Applicant has been attending the trial Court on the dates given by the trial Court.

¶27

In view of the aforesaid, the Application is allowed & the aforesaid condition [ Clause (iii) ] of the Order dated 06.02.2014 is relaxed.

2 of 3

APPP 106-17.doc

Accordingly, the Application is disposed of.

¶32

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶33

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

¶34

3 of 3

Subhash Motiram Waghmare v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash Motiram Waghmare v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrakant Mahadev Tavade Vs the State of Maharashtra

Amardeep Ashok Dhole Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dinesh Sona Patel Vs the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli

Mukesh Ram Malusare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mayur Dilip Dhotre Vs the State of Maharashtra

Aakash Ananta Maral Vs the State of Maharashtra