The applicant seizes leave to withdraw his bail application. The court notes the trial is expedited and directs the trial to conclude within one year. The application is disposed of as withdrawn.
Application disposed of as withdrawn. Leave granted to re-new prayer for bail if trial is not concluded without fault of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA 722-17.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.722 OF 2017
Karunesh Pratap Ambika Singh .Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr.M.S.Kadu, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr.V.V.Gangurde, APP, for the Respondent – State
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 13.06.2017
P.C.
. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the
Applicant seeks leave to withdraw this Application. However, the trial of the Applicant is expedited. The learned Judge to complete
the trial as expeditiously as possible and preferably within one
year from the date of receipt of this order.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
Karunesh Pratap Ambika Singh
The State of Maharashtra
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
