Dismissed

Gautam Dattatraya Gadge v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC12 Jun 2017BA/325/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application regarding alleged offences of murder and intimidation, the High Court examined the record which included postmortem findings of multiple injuries. Finding sufficient prima facie material to show the applicant's complicity in the death, the Court refused to enlarge the applicant on bail.

What did the court decide?

Bail application rejected; applicant not enlarged on bail.

Gautam Dattatraya Gadge Vs the State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2017)

41-ba.325.2017

1/4

nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.325 OF 2017

¶6

Gautam Dattatraya Gadge ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶7

Mr.E.B.Dixit i/b Mr.P.R.Yadav, for the Applicant.

¶8

Mr.Y. M. Nakhwa, A.P.P for the Respondent-State

¶9

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

¶10

DATE : 12^th JUNE, 2017

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

By this application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on

¶14

bail in connection with C.R.No.116 of 2016 registered with the Koregaon Police Station, Satara, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 302, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Learned Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has

¶16

41-ba.325.2017

¶17

2/4

¶18

been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. He submitted that it is a case of accidental death and that the FIR has been lodged by the deceased’s sister after 3 days. He submitted that it is the applicant who took his wife – Priyanka @Radha (deceased) to the hospital and admitted her to the Civil Hospital. He submitted that the applicant has a 3 year old child and that there is nobody to look after the child.

¶19

Learned APP opposed the application.

¶20

Perused the papers. According to the complainant, who is the sister of the deceased, she was informed on 3^rd July, 2016, that her sister – Priyanka @Radha was admitted to the Civil Hospital and that she had been assaulted. According to the complainant, soon after Radha's marriage with the applicant, the applicant started abusing and assaulting her, as he was suspecting her character. She has stated that Radha and their mother had

¶21

lodged complaints against the applicant with the Koregaon Police and Rahimatpur Police. According to the complainant, Radha had also disclosed about the ill-treatment meted out to her by the applicant, to her aunt and other relatives. In the inquest panchanama, which is on page 32 of the

¶22

41-ba.325.2017

¶23

3/4

¶24

application, column no.13, it is noted that deceased – Radha had slipped in the bathroom on 2^nd July, 2016, as a result of which she became unconscious, pursuant to which, she was admitted to the hospital, by her husband. The postmortem report shows that deceased had sustained as many as 33 injuries on her person i.e contusions on her left chin, upper forearm, left mid-arm, left upper arm posterior side, right mid-thigh etc. The deceased had also sustained multiple linear abrasions on her body. The report tendered by the learned APP shows that the cause of death was ‘multiple injuries as well as head injuries.' Prima facie, there is sufficient material to show the complicity of the applicant.

¶25

Considering the material on record, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on bail.

¶26

Hence, the Application for bail is rejected and disposed of as

such.

41-ba.325.2017

4/4

It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima

¶31

facie for deciding the aforesaid application, and the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the

¶32

observations made in this order.

¶33

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Gautam Dattatraya Gadge v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gautam Dattatraya Gadge v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Motiram Waghmare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mukesh Ram Malusare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mayur Dilip Dhotre Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dipak Yashwant Dorlekar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dada Ganpat Hake Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rajkumar Kaushik @ Sharma and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.