8 Since the accused are being charged under the provisions of MCOC Act, the prosecution has filed an affidavit and in the said affidavit, it is admitted that the present applicant has no criminal antecedents, even he has not been charge-sheeted alongwith the principal accused and the present case is the only criminal case registered against him. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that no role is attributed to the applicant and the fact that Ashruba Sonawane has identified him, it can only be said that the present applicant was standing outside the room. The applicant has been identified by the person, which would show that he had not entered into the house of the first informant at the time of commission of robbery and neither he has caused any hurt to the first informant. It is apparent that only after the car was seized, Ashruba has given registration number of the car. In his statement, he had not even mentioned the Make of the said car. It is, in these circumstances that the observations can be made under Section 21, Sub-clause (4)(b) of MCOC Act and it can be said that while on bail, the applicant may not indulge into similar offence. It is not stated in the affidavit that there are confession statements of the co-accused, which could be admissible. The applicant has made out a case for grant of bail. However, the same shall not be considered for the purpose of quashing of the first information report under the provisions of
