Bail application withdrawn by the applicant after trial commenced. Application dismissed as withdrawn without being heard on merits.
Liberty to withdraw the bail application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
7.ba1565.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1565 OF 2017
Amol Bandu Shilimkar. ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondents.
Mr. Prashant Raut i/b. Mr. Bhanudas L. Jagtap, advocate for Applicant.
Ms. S.S. Kaushik, APP for State.
Mr. M.S. Talbar, PSI, Rajgad Police Station.
CORAM : SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : DECEMBER 20, 2017
P.C.:
1 Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that in fact, the trial
has commenced and three witnesses have been examined in Sessions Case No. 165 of 2013. In view of this, learned Counsel for the applicant upon instructions seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is granted in the interest of justice. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that the application is not heard on merits.
( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J)
Talwalkar
1/1
Amol Bandu Shilimkar
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
