Single judge rejected criminal bail application. The court held that granting bail would endanger the life of the first informant due to the use of a dangerous weapon on petty grounds during an assault.
Application rejected; trial court directed to dispose matter within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29.ba-297.17.doc
ppn 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.297 OF 2017
Sainath Balu Vitekar .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Viresh V. Purwant for the applicant. Ms.A.A. Takalkar, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. Mr.Pramod Pawar, API Nhava Sheva Police Station.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE : 8th August 2017
P.C. :
. The application is filed for bail in C.R.No.I-83 of 2015 registered with Nhavasheva Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506(2),109 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Paper of investigation were made available for perusal of this Court. Both the sides are heard.
ppn 2 29.ba-297.17.doc
ppn 3 29.ba-297.17.doc
not disposed of within three months, there will be liberty to the applicant to come to this Court for relief of bail.
T.V. NALAWADE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged with offences under Sections 307, 506(2) and 109 read with 34 of IPC given the danger to the victim's life.
Sainath Balu Vitekar
State of Maharashtra
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
