The High Court disposed of a criminal bail application as withdrawn without arguments. An accompanying intervention application was allowed and disposed of. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26.ba-250.17.doc
ppn 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.250 OF 2017
Nitin Mahadev Mogal .. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.509 OF 2017
IN
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.250 OF 2017
Vaibhav Prakash @ Appa Londhe .. Intervenor Vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ---
Mr.S.H. Nimbalkar for the applicant.
Mr.Deepak Thakare, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. Mr.Vikas B. Shivarkar for the intervenor.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATE : 8th August 2017
P.C. :
. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the proceedings. He has not advanced the arguments. Application is disposed of as withdrawn. Intervention application is allowed and disposed of.
T.V. NALAWADE, J.
Nitin Mahadev Mogal
State of Maharashtra
Vaibhav Prakash @ Appa Londhe
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
