Two bail applications filed by Rupesh Nathu Taware were decided by a single judge. The applications were dismissed due to the non-prosecution of the matter.
Bail was not granted in either application as they were dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ba.1898-2017.doc
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
| BAIL APPLICATION NO. | 1898 OF 2017 |
|---|---|
| Rupesh Nathu Taware V/s. The State of Maharashtra |
… Applicant …Respondent |
| WITH | |
| BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1650 | OF 2017 |
| Rupesh Nathu Taware V/s. |
… Applicant |
| The State of Maharashtra ----- |
…Respondent |
| None for Applicant. Mr. S.S. Hulke, APP for the Respondent/Sta ----- |
te. |
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 29th NOVEMBER 2017
P.C.:
None appears for the applicant. Even on earlier occasion, none appeared for the applicant.
Both applications are dismissed for non-prosecution.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Rupesh Nathu Taware
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
