The applicant failed to appear for the restoration hearing of a dismissed criminal application. The court held the application dismissed for non-prosecution as the party was not interested in pursuing it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appp.758-2017.doc
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 758 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 449 OF 2016
Dattatray Balasaheb Khopatkar … App l icant V/s. Pitake Vinay Prabhakar & Anr. … Respondents -----
Mr. Sarwadnya S. Kathane i/b Sameer A. Ranade for Applicant. Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 29th NOVEMBER 2017
P.C.:
1] This is an application for restoration of Criminal Application
No.449 of 2016 which dismissed for default on 13th February 2017.
2] Today also the Advocates appearing for the applicant are not
present. Advocate who appears on behalf of the Advocates on record seeks adjournment. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the present application.
3] Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Dattatray Balasaheb Khopatkar
Pitake Vinay Prabhakar
State
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
