In a bail application, the applicant sought liberty to withdraw the petition after hearing. The Court granted liberty and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
8 ba 675.2017.sxw
Dusane
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.675 OF 2017
(Nikhil Satpute vs. The State)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Court's or Judge's Orders
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's Orders
Mr. Aniket Nikam i/by Mr. Chetan S. Damre for the applicant.
Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for State.
CORAM :SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV , J DATE : 19th DECEMBER, 2017
P.C.:-
1 After hearing at length, the learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is granted in the interest of justice. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J)
Nikhil Satpute
The State
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
