time she again received phone call from Vishal's cellphone. It was revealed that time to her that she should come alone else the boy will be taken elsewhere. At Raholi Fata,Hingoli she could notice Vishal, that time two persons were accompanying Vishal. As soon as first informant saw her son Vishal, he hugged his mother and started weeping, the most natural reaction on the part of Vishal. The F.I.R. further proceeds that the persons who were accompanied with Vishal demanded RS. 20,000/- .That time, there was some verbal altercation between first informant and said persons. At that time Pralhad who accompanied first informant disclosed the said persons that he has made a phone call to police. After getting this particular information these two persons ran away from the spot and started running away in a white coloured car bearing no.MH-38-4044. The said vehicle was chased by the first informant and her companions. At Rahuli village the villagers stopped the said car and persons were apprehended. The Hingoli Police came there and they made inquiry that time they disclosed their identities as Sandip Raghunath Jadhao (accused no.1) ,Shrikant Dilip Gupta(accused no.2), Santosh Vitthal Shelke(accused no.3-the present applicant) and Prakash Rajaram Jadhao (accused no.4). Thus, it is clear that applicant was apprehended on the spot itself. Therefore, the submission of learned counsel for the applicant is not only misconceived but is misleading that the applicant is arrested only on the
