This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.APPRNo.42017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.540 OF 2016
Mr.Ninoy Rambhai Patel ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.S.B.Sawardekar, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.A.A.Takalkar, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR J.
DATED : 9th JANUARY 2017.
P.C . :
1 Heard both sides and perused the order dated 29th September 2016 releasing the applicant/accused on bail. The applicant/accused was released on bail by directing her to furnish one surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/- apart from executing PR bond.
2 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant/accused has furnished surety before the trial Court and the trial Court has ordered verification of the surety. According to the learned counsel, the process of verification of the surety is
1/2
Gaikwad RD
14.APPRNo.42017
going on and, therefore, the applicant requested extension of two weeks time.
3 As the applicant has furnished surety, so also he is released on provisional cash bail, two weeks time, as prayed, is granted and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a)
(A. M. BADAR J.)
2/2
Gaikwad RD
Ninoy Rambhai Patel
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
