Single judge of the Bombay High Court granted a brief order condoning a 105-day delay in the CBI's criminal revision application, finding the explanation sufficient in the application’s body, and disposed of the matter.
Condonation of delay of 105 days; Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-APPR-21-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.28 OF 2016
Central Bureau of Investigation )...APPLICANT
V/s.
Rangrao V. Pawar & Anr. )...RESPONDENTs
Ms. Rebecca Gonsalves ,Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S.B.Shelar i/by A.P.Steenson & Associates, Advocate for R.No.1.
Mr. Avinash Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 5th JANUARY 2017.
P.C. :
By this application, the Applicant-CBI is seeking condonation of delay of 105 days in preferring revision application challenging the order dated 8.5.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court Greater Bombay in Revision Application No.1422 of 2014.
Shivgan 1/2
13-APPR-21-2016.doc
2 Heard learned counsel for the Applicant as well as the learned counsel appearing for the non-applicants. Delay occasioned is that of 105 days and same is sufficiently explained in the body of the application. In this view of the matter, delay is condoned . Application is disposed of accordingly.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
Shivgan 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of over 105 days in preferring a criminal revision application can be condoned.
Central Bureau of Investigation
Rangrao V. Pawar
Respondent - State
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
