Girishkumar R Khandelwal v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The present application was disposed of as it did not survive the order passed in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 138 of 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Muj
5.appp.253.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 253 OF 2017 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 138 OF 2017
Babaji B. Chavan & Anr
… Applicants
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
… Respondent
AND
GIRISHKUMAR R KHANDELWAL ...Intervener
Mr. Shivshankar D. Patil for Ms. D.S. Matwankar for the Applicants. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. S.R. Pathak for the Intervener.
CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J. DATE : 27th NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C.:
In view of the order passed in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 138 of 2017, the present application does not survive and is accordingly disposed of.
(A.S.GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Babaji B. Chavan & Anr
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court