Allowed

Ravindra Bind v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC24 Nov 2017BA/945/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge granted bail to the applicant in a criminal case under sections 407, 411 read with 34 of the IPC. The court observed that a co-accused had been released on bail and allowed the applicant to be released on similar grounds, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail by furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with two solvent sureties in like amount, subject to conditions of attendance and no tampering with evidence.

Ravindra Bind Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

BA.945-2017.doc

¶2

Dond

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 945 OF 2017

¶5

Ravindra Bind

¶6

... App l icant

¶7

V/s.

¶8

The State of Maharashtra … Respondent -----

¶9

Ms. Roshni Singh for Applicant. Mr. A.A. Palkar, APP for State.

¶10

¶11

CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J.

¶12

DATE : 24^th NOVEMBER 2017

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

1] This is an application under 439 of Cr. P.C. for bail in CR No. I- 211 of 2016 dated 24.9.2016 registered at Uran Police Station, DistrictRaigad under Sections 407, 411 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

It is submitted that, in pursuance of Order dated 23^rd August 2017, the Investigating Agency has verified the record/documents pertaining to the permanent residential address of the applicant at his native place and properties held by the applicant and his father and it is informed that the documents submitted to the Investigating Agency are

1/3

BA.945-2017.doc

genuine documents.

2] It is the prosecution case that, the applicant and co-accused misappropriated the goods namely PVC resin powder of their employer. During the course of investigation, the applicant came to be arrested on 24.9.2016 and since then he is in jail. The co-accused namely Pintu Suresh Bind has already been released on bail by this Court. The record indicates that, the applicant has played same and/or similar role in the present crime as has been played by co-accused Pintu Bind. In view thereof, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity.

¶20

Hence, the following Order:

¶21

(i) The applicant be released on bail in CR No.I-211 of 2016 registered with Uran Police Statistic, District Raigad, on his furnishing PR bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount.

¶22

(ii) After his release from the jail, the applicant shall attend the concerned Uran Police Station on every 1^st Monday of the month between 10.00 a.m. To 1.00 p.m.

¶23

(iii) Applicant shall attend all dates before the Trial Court.

¶24

(iv) Any two consecutive defaults in complying with the

¶25

2/3

¶26

BA.945-2017.doc

¶27

aforesaid conditions, shall attract the provisions of cancellation of bail.

¶28

(v) Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and/or influence the prosecution witnesses.

¶29

4] Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶30

(A.S.GADKARI, J.)

¶31

3/3

Ravindra Bind v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Bind v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagnath Suresh Madbhavi @ Solapure Vs the State of Maharashtra

Saurabh Swapnil Surve Vs the State of Maharashtra

Hanumant @ Vikas Kashinath Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Avinash @ Shekhar Mahadu Mahale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jabras Jagdish Rajpur (Thakur) and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Joseph Ramos Pires and Ors. Vs Catherne Rochelle Rodrigo and Anr.