The applicant withdrew the criminal application after the investigating officer filed a report under Section 169 CrPC making compliance with earlier bail conditions unnecessary by this Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Application 1699 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
48 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1699 OF 2017
AHMED SHAIKH IMAM/SHAIKH @ PATEL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Shri. G.K. Naik-Thigle, Advocate, for applicant.
Shri. A.A. Jagatkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent.
Coram: T.V. NALAWADE, J.
Date: 25 April 2017
ORDER:
2 Application 1699 of 2017
Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.)
rsl
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ahmed Shaikh Imam
The State of Maharashtra
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
