13 months of the date of marriage. In view of these circumstances and the nature of allegations, the crime is registered for offence punishable under section 304-B of I.P.C. and also for offence punishable under section 498-A of I.P.C. Unless and until somebody from the house of husband is taken in custody, it will not be possible to ascertain as to what had happened on that day and as to how the deceased had sustained aforesaid injuries. The punishment for life is provided for aforesaid offence. All these circumstances are virtually ignored by the learned Judge of the Sessions Court. Unless there is custodial interrogation, atleast of the husband Sandeep, it will not be possible to reveal the truth. This Court has no hesitation to observe that the learned Judge of the Sessions Court has committed serious error in granting relief of anticipatory bail atleast in favour of husband, Sandeep Mahadeo Shelke. After custodial interrogation of Sandeep Shelke, the investigating agency may be in a position to collect some material and at that time, the matter as against respondent Nos. 3 to 5 can be decided. At present, it is not necessary to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in favour of respondent Nos. 3 to 5, but it is necessary to cancel the relief of anticipatory bail granted in favour of respondent No. 2 - Sandeep Shelke. In the result, following order is made.
