Allowed

Sachin S/O Annasaheb Dhoble v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC6 Feb 2017APPLN/106/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, allowed bail applications for applicants charged under Sections 395, 363, and 365 of the IPC. The court granted bail due to completed investigation, no criminal record, and local residence, directing the applicants to appear for the trial and refrain from influencing witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Applicants be released on bail upon furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount.

Sachin S/O Annasaheb Dhoble Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

Cri.Appln.105/2017

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2017

¶5

1.	Mahesh s/o Bhausaheb Bhagwat Age 25 years, Occu. Labour, R/o Vetal Baba Chowk, Loni, Taluka Rahata, Dist.Ahmednagar
2.	Rajendra s/o Bhausaheb Walunj, Age 21 years, Occu. Labour R/o Korade Galli, Loni, Taluka Rahata, Dist.Ahmednagar
3.	Kiran s/o Vitthal Vadak, Age 25 years, Occu. labour R/o Chinchpur, Taluka Sangamner District Ahmednagar	.. Applicants
	Versus
.	The State of Maharashtra, through Police Inspector, Police Station, Loni, District Ahmednagar	.. Respondent

¶6

WITH -

¶7

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 106 OF 2017

¶8

Sachin s/o Annasaheb Dhoble, Age 24 years, Occu. Business, R/o Loni Khurd, Taluka Rahata, District Ahmednagar

¶9

.. Applicant

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State of Maharashtra, through Police Inspector, Police Station, Loni, District Ahmednagar

¶12

..Respondent

¶13

Mr A.S. Kale, Advocate for applicant Mr R.V. Dasalkar, A.P.P. for respondent

¶14

Cri.Appln.105/2017

¶15

¶16

CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

¶17

DATE : 6^th February 2017

¶18

PER COURT

¶19

In C.R. No.I-118/2016, registered at Loni Police Station, District Ahmednagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 363, 365, in my opinion, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail for the following reasons:

¶20

(i) The investigation in the matter is complete and charge-sheet is filed;

¶21

(II) There are no criminal antecedents against the applicants and the applicants being local residents are very much available for further prosecution and if required for test identification parade.

¶22

As such, the applicants be released on bail, upon furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶23

Two consecutive absence of the applicants before the Court below during the trial will entail the trial Court to take out proceedings for cancellation of bail, if so desired.

¶24

The applicants shall not influence the prosecution witnesses and shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶25

Cri.Appln.105/2017

¶26

¶27

Criminal Applications stand allowed accordingly.

¶28

( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶29

vvr

Sachin S/O Annasaheb Dhoble v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin S/O Annasaheb Dhoble v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amol S/O Gaman Lange and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sahebrao Gangadhar Mahapure Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ramesh S/O Baban Mali Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ramprasad S/O Kashiba Harbale and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra

Bhimrao S/O Baburao Gaike Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mahesh S/O Bhausaheb Bhagwat and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra