The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the applicant's motion for withdrawal, dismissing the criminal application and expediting the trial hearing.
Motion for withdrawal granted; criminal application dismissed; trial hearing expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 195 OF 2017
Ramesh Baban Mali
..Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
..Respondent
Mr J.G. Toshniwal, Advocate h/f Mr R. B. Bhosle, Advocate for applicant Mr S.D. Ghayal, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 2nd February 2017
PER COURT
( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
vvr
Ramesh Baban Mali
The State of Maharashtra
N.W. SAMBRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
