High Court of Judicature at Bombay recalled the impugned order dismissing a Public Interest Litigation due to the absence of the petitioners and their advocate, restoring the matter to the file.
Criminal application allowed; PIL No. 25 of 2014 restored to file; impugned order dated 26th October 2016 recalled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPI. 54-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 54 OF 2016 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 25 OF 2014
Premji Keshavji Chedda & Anr. … Applicants / Versus Central Vigilance Commission & Ors. … Respondent
Mr. Bhavik Manek i/b Rajendra Bhandari, for the Applicants / Petitioners.
Mr. Divya Menon i/b Asim Vidyarthi, for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Dr. Birendra Saraf a/w P. N. Vora i/b M/s. Pramod Kumar & Co., for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & P. R. Bora, JJ. DATE : MARCH 3, 2017
PC.
. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents. For the reasons stated in the application, the impugned order dated 26th October, 2016 dismissing the PIL in the absence of the Petitioners and their advocate is recalled and Public Interest Litigation No. 25 of 2014 is restored to the file. Criminal application is accordingly allowed and disposed of in terms of prayer clause (a). Sd/Sd/[P. R. BORA, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Premji Keshavji Chedda
Central Vigilance Commission
Unnamed Representations Nos. 2-6
V. M. Kanade
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
