Purnima C Shah and Anr. v. M/S Sia Developers LLP and 15 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
in arbp 93-17 psv FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
5-app 123-17 in arbp 93-17
psv
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.123 OF 2017 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.93 OF 2017
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.Zain Mookhi with Mr.Ajinkya Patil i/b. Akshay Naik for Appellant.
Mr.Harsh Behany i/b. Maniar Srivastava Associates for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 14th MARCH 2018
P.C.:
By praecipe, a disposed of appeal is moved.
submits that the consent terms are not complied
with.
2
5-app 123-17 in arbp 93-17
with by the concerned party, alternate remedy may be adopted.
[G.S. KULKARNI, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.]
Appellant
Respondent No.1
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court