Disposed

Anthony @ Soni S. Abraham v. Central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi) and Anr.

Bombay HC14 Feb 2017APPA/89/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a miscellaneous application for bail, the Bombay High Court accepted the report of a medical board deeming the applicant fit for surgery and allowed the applicant to surrender to jail authorities within two weeks before a maintenance hearing.

What did the court decide?

Application accepted; applicant allowed to surrender to jail within two weeks; matter stood over for January 11, 2018.

Anthony @ Soni S. Abraham Vs Central Bureau of Investigation… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

(15)APPANo.15462017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATON NO.1546 OF 2017 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.20 OF 2017

¶6

Anil Laxmichand Menda ... Applicant

¶7

V/s.

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents

¶9

WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.52 OF 2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICTION NO.89 OF 2017 IN

¶10

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.52 OF 2017

¶11

Anthony @ Soni S. Abraham ... Applicant V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Anr.... Respondents

¶12

WITH

¶13

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.53 OF 2017

¶14

Philip Simon ... Appellant

¶15

V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Anr.... Respondents

¶16

WITH

¶17

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.54 OF 2017

¶18

Sajji Philip Abraham ... Appellant V/s. Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Anr.... Respondents

1/3

Gaikwad RD

(15)APPANo.15462017

WITH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.55 OF 2017

M.P.Abraham

... Appellant

V/s.

Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Anr.... Respondents

¶28

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATON NO.1491 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.22 OF 2017

¶29

Vishnu Bhaskar Mantri ... Applicant V/s. Union of India & Anr. ... Respondents

¶30

Mr.Ganesh Dalvi with Mr.Satish Muley, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶31

Mr.H.S.Venegaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent/CBI.

¶32

Mr.P.P.Jadhav, APP for the Respondent/State.

¶33

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

¶34

DATED : 14^th DECEMBER 2017.

¶35

P.C. :

¶36

1 It is seen that vide Order dated 16^th November 2017, this Court (Coram : Smt.Anuja Prabhudesai J.) had directed the applicant/accused to appear before the committee of Doctors to be constituted by the Dean of the J.J.Hospital, Mumbai with all relevant case papers as the applicant had not undergone surgery

2/3

Gaikwad RD

(15)APPANo.15462017

during the period of two months for which he was temporarily bailed out by this Court. The reason was to the effect that the applicant was unfit for surgery. That is how this Court had directed the Dean of the J.J.Hospital to constitute Committee of Doctors for examination of the applicant.

¶41

2 Today, report of Medical Board has received. It is marked as Exh.'X' for the purpose of identification. The report is to the effect that the applicant/accused is fit to undergo implant removal surgery.

¶42

3 The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that he wants to surrender before the concerned jail authority within a period of two weeks from today. Statement so made is accepted.

¶43

4 Stand over to 11^th January 2018.

¶44

3/3

¶45

Gaikwad RD

Anthony @ Soni S. Abraham v. Central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anthony @ Soni S. Abraham v. Central Bureau of Investigation (Cbi) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Bhagwan Shelar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Somnath Dhondiram Surve and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dattatray Balasaheb Khopatkar Vs Pitake Vinay Prabhakar and Anr.

Vishnu Bhaskar Mantri Vs Union of India and Anr.

Imran Ayub Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Swapnil Arjun Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.