The Allahabad High Court dismissed the criminal application for want of prosecution. The applicant failed to appear, did not prosecute, and did not file an affidavit of service despite earlier court direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33-APPLN-449-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.449 OF 2016
DATTATRAY BALASAHEB KHOPATKAR )...APPLICANT
V/s.
SHRI PITAKE VINAY PRABHKAR AND ANR. )...RESPONDENTS
None for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 13th FEBRUARY 2017.
P.C. :
1 On 5th August 2016, noting absence of the applicant, this court directed issuance of notice to respondent no.1 making it returnable after three weeks. In addition to court notice, private service was permitted. The office endorsement shows that spare copy was not supplied in order to enable the office to issue notice to respondent no.1. Affidavit of service is also not filed as seen from the office note. Today also, none appeared for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the present application. Hence, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 1/1
DATTATRAY BALASAHEB KHOPATKAR
SHRI PITAKE VINAY PRABHKAR
THE STATE
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
