Disposed
Shahid Sayyad Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/413/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-APPA-413-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.413 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.904 OF 2014
SHAHID SAYYAD SHAIKH )...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT
Mr.S.Y.Kale, Advocate for the Applicant in Criminal Application No.25 of 2016 in Criminal Appeal No.219 of 2015.
Mr.Ameet Palkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.219 OF 2015
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 22nd MARCH 2017
P.C. :
Sayyed Shaikh with a prayer that he may be permitted to change
his advocate and to engage another advocate.
avk 1/2
22-APPA-413-2017.doc
his own choice by entrusting the matter to such advocate of his choice.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 2/2
Shahid Sayad Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court