Allowed

Sandip Prabhakar Bhoir v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC21 Mar 2017APPA/140/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court suspended the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the applicant convicted for abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC and cruelty under Section 498-A IPC. The court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail during the pendency of his appeal.

What did the court decide?

Substantive sentence of imprisonment suspended; applicant directed to be released on bail upon executing PR bond and furnishing surety of Rs. 15,000/-.

Sandip Prabhakar Bhoir Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

901-APPA-140-2017.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.140 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.79 OF 2017

¶4

Sandip P. Bhoir )...Applicant V/s. State Of Maharashtra )...Respondent

¶5

Mr. K.S.Patil i/by Janita Menzies, Advocates for the Applicant.

¶6

Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the Respondent - State.

¶7

CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 21^st MARCH, 2017.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

This is an application for suspension of sentence and releasing the Applicant-Accused on bail during the pendency of the appeal filed by him. The Applicant-Accused has been convicted of the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 of IPC. For the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC, he is sentenced to suffer RI for 4 years apart from payment of fine of Rs.3,000/- and for the offnece punishable under Section 498-A of the IPC, he is sentenced to suffer RI for one year apart from

¶10

Shivgan 1/4

¶11

901-APPA-140-2017.doc

¶12

payment of fine of Rs.2,000/-. The appeal filed by him is already admitted for final hearing by this Court.

¶13

2 Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the Applicant-Accused as well as the learned APP for the State.

¶14

3 According to the learned APP, three incidents are reflected from the judgment and order which demonstrate abetment by the Applicant-Accused to his wife for commission of suicide by her. The learned APP pointed out suicide note written by the deceased-wife and submitted that this is a fit case to sustain the sentence.

¶15

4 I have carefully considered the rival submissions and also perused the record made available. On 23.3.2008, the deceased married the Applicant-Accused and started co-habiting with him. On 7.1.2012, she committed suicide by consumption of oregano-phosphate poison. Suicide note written by her reflects that husband used to suspect her character because of receipt of telephone call on her mobile by unknown person. This is construed as abetment of suicide and accordingly, the ApplicantAccused is convicted of the offences punishable under Sections

¶16

Shivgan 2/4

¶17

901-APPA-140-2017.doc

¶18

498-A and 306 of IPC.

¶19

5 It is well settled that abetment does not involve actual commission of crime but it is crime apart. Abetment is complete when other is instigated to commit an act of offence. However, at the same time one is also required to keep in mind Section 107 of IPC which requires mens-rea and without knowledge and intention, there cannot be abetment. Such knowledge and intention must relate to crime in question. All these aspects will be kept in mind while deciding the appeal. Suffice to state that short sentence of 4 years is imposed on the Applicant-Accused and the appeal filed by him is not likely to hear in near future. Therefore, the Applicant-Accused who was on bail during the pendency of

¶20

the trial is entitled for liberty till disposal of the appeal and as such, the order:

¶21

(1) Application is allowed.

¶22

(2) Substantive sentence of imprisonment

¶23

imposed on the Applicant-Accused is suspended

¶24

and he is directed to be released on bail on

¶25

executing PR bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/-

¶26

Shivgan 3/4

¶27

901-APPA-140-2017.doc

¶28

and on furnishing surety in the like amount.

¶29

(A. M. BADAR, J.)

¶30

Shivgan 4/4

Sandip Prabhakar Bhoir v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandip Prabhakar Bhoir v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babanrao Dnyanoba Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nitin Deoram Kadali Vs the State of Maharashtra

Rajesh Swarupchand Kankaria and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Renuka Bharat Ballal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shankar Hanumant Nagam Vs the State of Maharashtra

Narendra Manbahaddur Soni @ Lala Vs the State of Maharashtra