Single judge criminal application for suspension of sentence and bail was rejected after the High Court found the applicant complicit in the crime on the basis of prosecution evidence and found the warrant of arrest plausible.
The application for suspension of sentence and enlargement on bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
appa-252-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 252 OF 2017
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.217 OF 2014
Mahimud A. Latif Qureshi …..Applicant/Appellant versus
The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent
Mr.Ujwal R.Agandsurve for the Applicant. Mr.Rajan Salvi APP for the State.
CORAM : A.A. SAYED &
SARANG V.KOTWAL,JJ. DATED : 27 SEPTEMBER 2017
P.C.:
This is an Application for suspension of sentence and enlargement on bail to the Applicant.
(SARANG V.KOTWAL, J.)
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
1/1
Uday.P.Kambli
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant who is alleged to be complicit in the crime.
Warrant of arrest being already plausible.
Mahimud A. Latif Qureshi
The State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
