Applications regarding bail in criminal appeals from the year 2012. The court accepted that applicants were not pressing the applications, listed them for final hearing, and disposed of them as not pressed.
The bail applications were disposed of as not pressed by the applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03-APPA-1186-17.odt
1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1186 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.935 OF 2012
Ramnath Mangal Pawshe .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1187 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.938 OF 2012
Mangal Rama Pawshe
.... Applicant
versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1387 OF 2012 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.971 OF 2012
Pradeep Namdev Gondhali .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Nesarikar
2 / 2 03-APPA-1186-17.odt
WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1468 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1144 OF 2012
Janardan Mahadu Gondhali .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
CORAM : A. A. SAYED & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 26th SEPTEMBER, 2017.
P.C. :
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (A. A. SAYED, J.)
Ramnath Mangal Pawshe
Mangal Rama Pawshe
Pradeep Namdev Gondhali
Janardan Mahadu Gondhali
The State of Maharashtra
A. A. SAYED
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
